Ollie Robinson: ECB has no room for error in investigation

The events that overshadowed England's drawn first Test against New Zealand at Lord's were bitterly disappointing.

To learn that historical racist and sexist tweets were posted by Ollie Robinson, on the day he was making his Test debut and after he and his England team-mates had lined up in T-shirts displaying anti-discrimination slogans, was all rather surreal.

All this at a time when the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has been facing claims from former umpires John Holder and Ismail Dawood, and Yorkshire are investigating allegations of racism from their former spinner Azeem Rafiq.

Robinson is now 27. He posted the tweets in 2012 and 2013 when he was aged 18 and 19. To know his back story is to know that he was a teenager with his own issues.

Not long after he made the social media posts in question he was sacked by Yorkshire for "unprofessional behaviour" as a result of his poor timekeeping around training sessions.

PM agrees Robinson ban 'over the top'
Robinson suspended for historical racist and sexist tweets

Still, the ECB must go further to do the due diligence on the players who are selected to represent the country.

And that does not mean having a quick scroll through a player's social media history to find anything that should be deleted.

It means making absolutely certain you are selecting the right people, so that when you dress your players in T-shirts carrying messages about anti-discrimination, you know those players mean it.
ADVERTISEMENT

There are some who take the view that sport is not the place to be making these sorts of statements, but that is incredibly naive.

Like the whole of society, sport is facing issues of inclusivity, how it proves everyone is welcome. Cricket has its part to play, which is why it is so important the ECB handles the Robinson case correctly.

For any mistake it made in not knowing everything there was to know about Robinson before he pulled on his England cap, the ECB's handling of the situation since the tweets emerged has been good.

He apologised immediately and has been suspended pending an investigation, meaning he will miss the second Test at Edgbaston this week.

Some people will have sympathy for Robinson, saying that tweets posted almost a decade ago should not affect his career in 2021, especially given the nature of his apology. Both the Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden have supported that side of the debate.

But part of the investigation has to be that Robinson is not the same person now as he was then. It is not simply a case of taking him away from the England team for a little while, then bringing him back. It has to be a proper process.

Now he is missing the series decider against New Zealand, the earliest Robinson could play Test cricket again is in August against India.

By that point, the likes of Ben Stokes, Chris Woakes and Sam Curran will be around again, so even if Robinson is cleared to be available, his path back into the team could be blocked. In that sense, there could be lasting ramifications for the individual.

However, this is bigger for the ECB and the game in this country than what ultimately becomes of Robinson.

Not just because of what happened at Lord's, or even the other cases I mentioned earlier, but for anyone at any level of cricket who may have ever felt excluded, it is absolutely vital that the ECB get this right.
England players and support staff wear anti-discrimination T-shirts before the opening day of the first Test against New Zealand at Lord's
Before the start of play on Wednesday England players and support staff wore T-shirts that said "cricket is a game for everyone" on the front, with the back saying they stand against different types of discrimination

Yes, sticking T-shirts on your players and parading them in front of the cameras comes from a place of good intentions, but it is utterly meaningless unless you can demonstrate you are taking these issues seriously.

If the Robinson process comes across as flimsy and he is back in the England side before we know it, then the ECB will be accused of not implementing the changes it says it has.

Perhaps for that reason England will be in no hurry to have him back.

When he does return, the governing body has to be certain there are no other skeletons in the closet, either from him or any other player.

We have heard the likes of Michael Holding and Ebony Rainford-Brent speak so honestly about the discrimination they have faced in the game and it is clear there is still work to do for those issues to be removed.

There is so much more to the ECB demonstrating that cricket is a game for everyone than words and gestures.

It has to be absolutely committed, and that means there can be no room for error in the Robinson investigation.
BBC

With the Robinson thing I get he was just 18 years old and naive/stupid. However if the ECB didn't do anything about it, there would be all sorts of repercussions. A ban was inevitable.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson's intervention in the England and Wales Cricket Board's (ECB) suspension of bowler Ollie Robinson is "unwelcome", says former England batsman Mark Ramprakash.

Robinson has been suspended by the ECB pending an investigation into historical racist and sexist tweets posted in 2012 and 2013.

The Prime Minister said he was "supportive" of Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden saying the ECB had "gone over the top" and should "think again".

Asked on BBC Breakfast what he thought of the PM's involvement, Ramprakash, who played 52 Tests for England between 1991 and 2002, said: "I think it is very unwelcome. He is trying to bear undue influence in this case.

"If I was Ollie Robinson I'm not sure I'd want Boris Johnson involved and trying to support me."

Ramprakash, who was also England batting coach between 2014 and 2017, added the England dressing room would have been a "pretty toxic place" if Jofra Archer or Moeen Ali had been part of the same team as Robinson at Lord's.

"I've heard people express sort of sympathy with Ollie Robinson, and say 'hasn't he shown a lot of character?', but I haven't heard enough about the victims or the people that these tweets are aimed at," said Ramprakash.

"I think it [apology] has been accepted. He stood up in front of the group and apologised. As a group we appreciate he's a different person now. He's done a lot of maturing and growing since then and he's got the full support of the team." - James Anderson