And When the Hegemon Goes Home..is Forced Home....

thesaker.is/look-homeward-hegemon-part-1...-its-people-at-home/

its going to be be hell for the citizenry

it will be America/Canada police state extraordinaire for we the people.  the Anglo/Zio empire will make internal hell where they failed to make a New World Order

What Anglo/Zion empire and New World Order?

You have no proof of any of this Maps.  It's all paranoia in your mind Bro.

oh yes we do..lots and lots of proff!

Show us! We're not convinced of your wild conspiracy theories and usual paranoia!

we know how the hegemon makes its money...

there is currently an ongoing lawsuit here in Canada against the federal government... that alleges financial control of the Canadian central bank and currency and seeking to restore Canadian public financing free of any national debt due to the way our currency is used..as it used to be prior to 1974..when a clear change took place that accrued debt to the nation whereas no debt previously accrued from public spending.

it is easy to prove all what I claim.  there are hundreds of painstakingly researched books by scholars that constitute additional proof...

there are tons of lawsuits that have been successful against banks that constitute proof.  and there are any number of thousands of institutional audits...the depart of the General Accounting office of any government that exposes much of the fraud that is public financing

the proof is all there...for the taking or asking

A lawsuit is not proof of anything other than proof of the existence of a lawsuit.  Try again Maps.  We are not convinced of these wild conspiracy theories.

is financial activity an illegal and usurious win lose operation..that for some to win others must lose..and that over time this leads to irreversible concentration of wealth and economic failure ::confused::

that is proved beyond any doubt.  take a bank for example...put your money in there and you lose money over time because of serviced charges that grows continually and the inflationary factor that forces this growth and that the growth is usurious..and illegal..and that this illegality that flows from the big banks is never challenged by the departments of attorneys general the world over.

Obama for example is faced constantly by crescendos of calls for the prosecution of the big banks for their crimes....clear financial crimes and he never complies..which puts in an illegal situation himself..as ell as all the governments in the world who refuse to prosecute financial crime

no a lawsuit is not proof of financial crime..but the activities of banks, a few in number, can be known..is known in fact..that their crimes are well documented and their prosecution avoided only by government unwillingness to prosecute

but you cannot know the opinion of an electorate as your claims imply that you do in fact know..when that electorate has just carried out an election the results of which suggests..indeed prove you to be dead wrong, that you are wrong indeed

you cannot know that the election was fraudulent as you firmly established.

now you running wild looking to to prove my claims and general operation system as in need of proof

red effing herring again. 

we know banking and finance and the world of financial institutions and their relation to politics.  we know and can know and prove their activity all the time, and do so all the time in fact..that their activity and behavior is indeed criminal

Yada yada yada.

We're still waiting for proof, not your opinions Maps.

yada mih rarse.  is you who in need of proff, wasting time with all this nonsense

yuh loose in Guyana and it is a normal development in that type of activity..politics.  all you have to do is prove out it the system worked and if it did not get it corrected.  and if you still lose but form the opposition then get to works, work out the mistakes and come again

that is the goddam process that you and your party have chosen now you unhappy with the result as if you did not expose yourself to the process with the intent to take what came legitimately

you want to change the rules you refuse to accept loses.  what the hell kind of democrat are you ::confused::

don't you see in you rabid refusal to accept defeat, to cool out and look at the reality rationally that you are the Burnham type, the dictator in waiting, the rarse reaction to the social change?

don't you see that... ::confused::

you are not democratic at all snoops..not a smidgeon of it flowed from you all the way through this electoral process.