-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
16 Dec 2013 12:39 #168667
by mapoui
after one time its 2 Rev...
Bally prolly did not feel threatened by me. he was prolly confident I would always be there I guess
next time he was not so sanguine. still his reaction sophisticated or not seem quite natural to me. and I believe both boards will live well.
both will prolly inherit a dying sissy although I do not look forward to that day :'( :'(
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
16 Dec 2013 12:42 #168670
by mapoui
there is a flow to Ballys board in which no posts or few posts at a time like this is normal. it means nothing negative at all. check back later or tomorrow night and see then.
Indeed I posted several times there today already..and the Rev as well
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 64700
-
Thank you received: 38
-
-
16 Dec 2013 12:49 #168677
by chairman
i like a very fast flowing board with lots of opinions.
I am not afraid of any board. My stats prove that it wont be long we are the top WEST INDIES CRICKET FORUM.
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
16 Dec 2013 13:39 #168698
by mapoui
one thing I really like about yuh board chairman is the music section you put in. nothing beats that.
dat was smart
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
easyrider
-
-
Visitor
-
16 Dec 2013 14:23 - 16 Dec 2013 15:11 #168711
by easyrider
Let us get this in perspective please.
Shillingford was called when he was 19 or so by domestic umpires so this is his third third 'offence'.
There are a few legitimate things the Indians can be rightly accused of but calling Shillingford foul of the rules is down to the umpires and not India, Indians or the BCCI.
If it is felt other international bowlers 'throw' the ball then, I assume, it is an issue for the umpires, rather than anyone else.
I believe Murali was completely exonerated through the same testing in Australia, so unless the equipment used senses race then the results are scientific.
Clearly we need to understand what this 15 degrees arm extension of the elbow really means in practice.
On return from testing this time, like last time, Shillingford looked more round armed so hope he does well in the retest but surely this would totally undermine him.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 97099
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 4733
-
Thank you received: 2
-
-
-
easyrider
-
-
Visitor
-
16 Dec 2013 20:12 #168746
by easyrider
The important fact of being called almost 13 years ago is telling.
I do not aim to seem harsh but that is enough time and from quite an informative age to have had the necessary corrections ironed out.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
boquiesse
-
-
Visitor
-
27 Jan 2014 11:27 #175163
by boquiesse
Shillingford stupidee.
He get ban before.
He does pelt.
But Sunil does also pelt.
However to the unclothed eye Shilly flexing more than Sunil.
Shilly shoulda study Sunil so he could see how to get away with it.
Instead he follow Lawson and feel he could pelt with impunity.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 97099
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
27 Jan 2014 11:32 #175166
by ketchim
where you been , boquiesse ?
nice to read your in depth analysis of the spin twin pelters.... ::LOL::
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
West Indies Cricket Fans Forum
-
THE PITCH
-
Shillingford suspended from bowling
Time to create page: 0.195 seconds