TINO BEST: Ordinary, Second Rate, Run-of-the mill Bowler

Lookit here, Gabriel dont even know how to hold the Seam :

AND he is Selected as a Seam bowler ...

where is our Left hander .....Santokie is the only one in the WI ?  :-\

was early mawning and he had boo boo in he yeye !  ;D

Rheum is made up of mucus, skin cells, oils and dust. The rheum that comes from

the eyes and forms eye boogers is called gound, which you may know as eye gunk

Happy to be you as, at the moment. with my global view we are synchronised in the main.

Nice to chat to the forum.

Okay I don't regard Tino highly, but you're being way too harsh on Tino. I guess it's true that you can't rely on Tino to lead an attack. IMO anyways.

Rampaul is the only wicket taking bowler I can think of ATM leading the attack.

Chin:

* The fact is Edwards played in 55 tests and took 165 wickets----that's 3 wickets per test.

* Great bowlers usually average 4+ wickets per test.

* Edwards with an average of 3 wickets per test turned out to be an average performer.

* By the way, in the history of WI cricket, only 9 bowlers took more wickets than Edwards---see link:

stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/i...results;type=bowling


BOTTOM LINE:

Fidel Edwards was undoubtedly an excellent talent----the great WI batsman Brian Lara saw something special in him. But Fidel's inability to maximize his talent into becoming a more productive bowler cannot be blamed on the WICB----Fidel just didn't have what it takes to be a great bowler----the numbers don't lie---Fidel Edwards was an average bowler after 55 tests----he took 165 wickets at an average of 37.87.

Rev