This Is More Like I know It To Be

alethonews.com/2021/08/16/former-pfizer-...e-on-covid-vaccines/

FORMER PFIZER VP LATEST MESSAGE ON COVID VACCINES
Video

Look at what the former Pfizer leader is saying, compared to what Ketchim and Trinidaddy have been saying and recommending for us all to do: 'GO TAKE THE VACCINE!!!'

Billy, how come everyone you link to is a raving racist? Here's the Michael Yeadon you've just linked, speaking like an idiot on twitter:

Yeadon: "Every grooming gang into pedo rape & buggery are Pakistani Muslims. Under aged girls deserve no respect & any part of their bodies can be used for Muslim pleasure. There was even a pseudo scientific paper out recently which claimed that there wasn’t a specific offence of gang grooming of children so there couldn’t be a report on it."

Response on Twitter: "Where is this report?"

Yeadon: "Currently, it’s making its way down the inner thigh of a 14 year old Rochdale schoolgirl”.

Response on Twitter: "So you again have no proof?"

Yeadon: "Google ‘Muslim & Goat rape’. There’s a disturbing and quite definitive YouTube video. No grooming involved, but defo non consensual. This industrial scale child rape has one type of owner (always muslims)."

Response on Twitter: "You're insane, man. Your proof is youtube?"

Yeadon: “‘To make [you] particularly appealing to Muslim men [your] telephone number has been tattooed onto the backsides of all white girls starting secondary school’ … I’ll prob get banned for this, but I’m only teasing. I meant ’14 year olds’, obviously! A good half pint of Muslim cum injected into those girls! Strong chance of serious, potentially life course changing STIs, on top of the sex abuse & threats to life traumas they suffered. These young victims should have received priority CAMH care. Did they get it, anyone know?”

etc etc

That's another of your heroes, Billy.

Funny how everyone you link is either pro segregation, hates blacks, hates Jews, hates Muslims, and linked to libertarians, Christian fundamentalists or Big Money.

Anyway, Yeadon is not an epidemiologist. He has a degree in pharmacology and is primarily a businessman. Actual experts in this field have debunked the video you've linked, here: www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-health...avirus-idUSL2N2N72CS

[quoteBilly Shatine]Look at what the former Pfizer leader is saying, compared to what Ketchim and Trinidaddy have been saying and recommending for us all to do: 'GO TAKE THE VACCINE!!!' [/quote]

VERDICT : False.
Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, who was filmed
giving a speech making claims about asymptomatic infection,
virus variants, the vaccine and its risks to pregnant women.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team

I like to investigate the authors of the crap you post here, Billy, and your latest one is particularly disgusting.

I've found tweets where Yeadon praises Enoch Powell, a British politician who got famous for being racist toward West Indians in the late 1960s. He cites Powell's famous “rivers of blood" speech (which rallied whites to force out blacks from Britain) and calls an old French novel about black and Muslim immigrants taking over the west "a good approximation of reality".

Elsewhere Yeadon tweets about his hatred for Remainers (he was fond of Brexit and Trump's wall), and his desire to ejaculate semen in the eye of British Remain voters (web.archive.org/web/20200106072052if_/ht.../1211988908625596422)

He's also vehemently right wing, hates the UK Labor Party, and is constantly praising Douglas Murray's racist screed “The Strange Death of Europe”, and Jean Raspali's “Camp of the Saints”, a book famous amongst the alt-right, as it deals with Europe being destroyed by crude, barbaric, African and Asian immigrants.

You have a problem Billy.

You instinctively seem drawn to alt-right pundits, and absolutely disgusting racists. I've also noticed that all the links you post here are by sites or people which promote the “white genocide theory”. It's amazing how social media propaganda brainwashes even West Indians into obedient Uncle Toms for the ultra wealthy.

Billy, how come everyone you link to is a raving racist? Here's the Michael Yeadon you've just linked, speaking like an idiot on twitter:

Yeadon: "Every grooming gang into pedo rape & buggery are Pakistani Muslims. Under aged girls deserve no respect & any part of their bodies can be used for Muslim pleasure. There was even a pseudo scientific paper out recently which claimed that there wasn’t a specific offence of gang grooming of children so there couldn’t be a report on it."

I should ignore you and go to bed! I had a long day! But i have a steaming cup of tea by my side right here and I think I should point out that the key is relevance, factful and accuracy...and entirely dependent on the reader/commentators ability to understand and respond similarly.

you have reduced yourself to a sliver of life responding to what i say here on the board. you are trying you endeavour best to win an opportunity to slay me at at my own cause. that's so sweet. lets hop I expose my next soo for you to try get a chop in.

who isn't racist/ who is? how can you tell anyway, either way, regardless???.
who can you tell what anyone is at any time, how they have actually live and what they are currently by lived experience?

how can you tell who they actually worked for? of they were ever bribed? and if they are bribed currently?

and what do you know yourself? what are you capable of?

you are supposed to be working at all times in your own interest so if the issues is relevant you are supposed to prove it one way or the other. if you know already - the facts then you have to prove nothing. if you don't know you have to do he work of proving it.

I would not be looking to find out if Yeadon's racist if I don't know from this subject matter. I would be looking at
his take on the subject matter. if its valid contribution then I can go with it. if not I can criticize or simply move on.

Same with PCR! PCR is a human being who can hold may ideas on different subjects all the time speak and write about them for all to read. who says he must hold only one opinion at a time?

Again its up to me deal with the issue I am interested in and not the rest if I am not keen on it. I am interested in the subject matter first and foremost. I am interest in PCR personal life only where that intersects with the subject matter as treated by PCR. if it doesn't not then it is the subject matter along I must deal with...its validity factual base and support for my own point of view where and if that is in there.

I don't know what you want, where you have been all your life and how you see the world and I care less and less as I see you operate here. I am interested in Yeadon's subject matter here and the validity of his contribution. does it square with the facts..to what extent does it square with the facts. what are all its interconnections...what he said there- if I can determine them all, or to the extent I can.

you are just wasting time! what is the big deal in all the aspects you raise? they are silly, childish inconsistent with experience/. all you are seeking for validity cannot be proved. for me to post up a link acceptable to you I must find an author who is clean on mid heat and spirit, 100% with some obscure standard you have not yet spelled out for me so that I can go find the commentator and his opinion I can post up just for you. so that you will be pleased and no doubt respond extensively, effusively on such an opinion

and of course if the chairman is reading this he to can go find even more such opinion for you so that he can keep you can keep posting away forever here, quite happily

Billy, have you figured out yet why all your "experts" are vehemently anti black, anti Jew, anti Muslim, pro-segregation, anti-evolution, and collect money from right-wing think tanks, Christian fundamentalists or the Republican Party?

On one hand you talk of "unity" and "collectivizing", on the other you exclusively post talking points of people ideologically opposed to such things.

You talk humanism on one hand, while defending Yeadon, a man who defends racist texts on twitter, jokes about ejaculating in the eyes of Brexit voters, and thinks Europe will collapse because of too many African immigrants.

You've been fully colonized by the right-wing social media brainwashing machinery.

You pretend "not to be concerned about the personal lives" of the people you quote, and you pretend "not to care about their stance on other issues", but it's much worse than that; you don't even care about verifying or robustly checking the validity of the things they say which you agree with.

You're a walking post-hoc rationalization machine. You pick and mix and twist to justify already held preconceptions.

Still waiting on proof that MesoAmerican civilization was started by Africans.

Still waiting on proof that vaccines stop female fertility/stop pregnancy.

Still waiting on proof that China/Russia/American/Jewish cabals are trying to depopulate the world.

Still waiting on proof that vaccines "magnetize humans", cause spike protein deaths, "won't lead to a second wave" etc etc etc

Where is your proof? Every time I check your statistics they contain some glaring error or fallacy, or are an outright misreading of trends. Every time I check the backgrounds of the people you cite, they're even worse.

You've constructed your own personal mad world out of suppositions, and vague fragments of half-ideas cobbled together from dozens of different crazy people. And this is sad, because the political movements these conspiracy theories help, and run interference for, are the very same political movements which hurt ordinary people, and black people especially. I mean, the Republican Party is right now engaging in massive levels of voter suppression and gerrymandering in preparation for the 2022 midterms - real life conspiracies - and here you are focusing on magnetic vaccines.

So did Trump lose the election Billy?

Do you believe in QAnon?

Why do you never answer this?

alethonews.com/2021/08/17/emmanuel-macro...alist-faux-centrism/

Emmanuel Macron’s Covid ‘health pass’ tyranny reveals the true extremism of globalist faux-centrism

By Neil Clark | RT | August 17, 2021

Macron was billed as the ‘moderate candidate’ in the 2017 French presidential election but there’s nothing moderate about this authoritarian who has transformed France into a police state under the guise of countering a virus.

A few weeks ago, I was in the picturesque Suffolk coastal resort of Southwold. There is a large mural of the novelist George Orwell – who once lived there – at the entrance of the renovated pier. It couldn’t have been a more appropriate moment to be reminded of the author of ‘1984’ for, in 2021, we are truly living in Orwellian times. Almost everything we are being told is an inversion of the truth. Extreme policies are being enacted across much of the Western world by those claiming to be ‘moderates’, while those who oppose the removal of basic, inalienable human freedoms and making them conditional on taking a new-on-the-market vaccine, or proving one’s ‘health status’, are the ones being labelled ‘extremists’ – and categorised by the elite’s propagandists as either ‘far-right’ or ‘hard-left’.

Nowhere is this better illustrated than in France.

It is now obligatory to present a ‘Pass sanitaire’ – proving you have been vaccinated or tested negative for Covid-19 or have recovered from the virus, to gain access to cafes, restaurants, health centres, libraries, department stores, long-distance trains and a whole host of public places. France has gone from a relatively free society to a 1940s-style ‘Where are your papers?’ state in an incredibly short time and without any proper parliamentary scrutiny or public debate. Macron the ‘moderate’ has turned into Macron the dictator.

What’s happened is deeply shocking – and worth more than one ‘Zut alors!’ – but actually not at all surprising when one considers what Macron’s brand of politics represents and in whose interests he governs (spoiler alert: it’s not the ordinary French people

alethonews.com/2021/08/18/is-natural-imm...than-the-covid-shot/

At first glance, this decline appears to be occurring in tandem with the rollout of COVID shots. January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots,2 and as of July 13, 48.3% were fully “vaccinated.”3

However, as noted in a July 12, 2021, STAT News article,4 “cases” had started their downward trend before COVID shots were widely used. “Following patterns from previous pandemics, the precipitous decline in new cases of Covid-19 started well before a meaningful number of people had been vaccinated,” Robert M. Kaplan, Professor Emeritus at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, writes. He continues:

“Nearly 50 years ago, medical sociologists John and Sonja McKinlay examined5 death rates from 10 serious diseases: tuberculosis, scarlet fever, influenzae, pneumonia, diphtheria, whooping cough, measles, smallpox, typhoid, and polio. In each case, the new therapy or vaccine credited with overcoming it was introduced well after the disease was in decline.

More recently, historian Thomas McKeown noted6 that deaths from bronchitis, pneumonia, and influenza had begun rapidly falling 35 years before the introduction of new medicines that were credited with their conquest. These historical analyses are relevant to the current pandemic.”

‘Case’ Decline Preceded Widespread Implementation of Jab

As noted by Kaplan, COVID-19 “cases” peaked in early January 2021. January 8, more than 300,000 new positive test results were recorded on a daily basis. By February 21, that had declined to a daily new case count of 55,000. COVID-19 gene modification injections were granted emergency use authorization at the end of December 2020, but by February 21, only 5.9% of American adults had been fully vaccinated with two doses.

Despite such a low vaccination rate, new “cases” had declined by 82%. Considering health authorities claim we need 70% of Americans vaccinated in order to achieve herd immunity and stop the spread of this virus, this simply makes no sense. Clearly, the COVID shots had nothing to do with the decline in positive test results.

To be clear, reported cases mean positive test results, and we now know the vast majority of positive PCR tests have been, and still are, false positives. They’re not sick. They simply had a false “positive.” Right now, we’re also faced with yet another situation that complicates attempts at data analysis, and Kaplan understandably did not address any of these confounding factors.

But just so you’re aware, if you have been fully “vaccinated,” then the CDC recommends running the PCR test at a cycle threshold (CT) of 28 or lower, which dramatically lowers your chance of a false positive result, but if you are unvaccinated, the PCR test is recommended to be run at a CT of 40 or higher, virtually guaranteeing a false positive.

This is just one way by which the CDC is manipulating data to make the COVID shots appear more effective than they are. This also allows them to falsely claim that the vast majority of new cases are among the unvaccinated.

Naturally, if unvaccinated are tested in such a way as to maximize false positives, then they’re going to make up the bulk of the so-called caseload. In reality, though, the vast majority of them aren’t sick.

Meanwhile, those who have received the jabs only count as a COVID case if they’re hospitalized and/or die with a positive test result. These widely differing testing strategies skew the data and allow for false interpretations to be mad

Natural Immunity Explains Decline in Cases

As noted by Kaplan, the most reasonable explanation for declining rates of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be natural immunity from previous infections, which vary considerably from state to state.7 He goes on to cite a study8 by the National Institutes of Health, which suggests SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was 4.8 times higher than previously thought, thanks to undiagnosed infection.

In other words, they claim that for every reported positive test result, there were likely nearly five additional people who had the infection but didn’t get a diagnosis. To analyze this data further, Kaplan calculated the natural immunity rate by dividing the new estimated number of people naturally infected by the population of any given state. He writes:9

“By mid-February 2021, an estimated 150 million people in the U.S. (30 million times five) may have had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. By April, I estimated the natural immunity rate to be above 55% in 10 states: Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.

At the other end of the continuum, I estimated the natural immunity rate to be below 35% in the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington …

By the end of 2020, new infections were already rapidly declining in nearly all of the 10 states where the majority may have had natural immunity, well before more than a minuscule percentage of Americans were fully vaccinated. In 80% of these states, the day when new cases were at their peak occurred before vaccines were available.

In contrast, the 10 states with lower rates of previous infections were much more likely to experience new upticks in Covid-19 cases in March and April … By the end of May, states with fewer new infections had significantly lower vaccination rates than states with more new infections.”

cont'd
alethonews.com/2021/08/18/is-natural-imm...than-the-covid-shot/